Helping companies communicate better with their customers through the use of weblogs and smart user interface design.

Heavy Loyalists vs. Light Loyalists

Wednesday, June 9th, 2004 by MR

John Moore writes about a study conducted by BzzAgent discussing which group is best suited for Word-of-Mouth advertising, Heavy Loyalists or Light Loyalists. I always find studies on WOM advertising fascinating because in reality it really is one of those things you can’t control. If someone finds your product or service good enough to talk about they will. If they don’t, they won’t.

Many times marketers get too caught up in how they can achieve WOM advertising without even putting their focus into the product. Great products many times have a way of speaking for themselves. That doesn’t mean that we should pay attention to how we should get the word out about them, but getting the word out on a shoddy product does more damage than we think.

For example, Nokia spent so much time developing hype for their N-Gage that when it came out and everyone found out how horrible it was it killed any chance for decent WOM advertising for their latest edition, which is far superior. The newest N-Gage is the type of thing that geeks would be more than willing to talk about on their blogs and therefore increasing the viral spread of the technology. However, mention “N-Gage” to anyone and they will cringe simply because the first version is stuck in their head. The “idea” of N-Gage is not a pleasant one.

Back to the heavy loyalist vs. light loyalist issue. Two easy examples to think of are Apple and Linux which definitely have heavy loyalists followings. The problem with these heavy loyalists is that they mostly come from the geek demographic and are unable to effectively reach a company’s desired market. Ever have an Apple fanatic try to convince you to switch? It can be intimidating to say the least. Their WOM advertising means almost nothing for major marketshare. However, get an average person to switch to a Mac or Linux and have them extol its virtues to others and you have a better chance of successful WOM advertising. Not everyone has the time it takes to be a heavy loyalists and are too willing to switch to a better alternative so its the mindshare of the light loyalists that is the important piece to the puzzle.

However, like I said at the beginning, gaining that mindshare is not something you can really strategize for. To say it just happens would be silly of me, but also to say you can plan on it would be just as silly. Again it just goes back to offering a quality product that makes people want to talk about it.

Reader Comments

6 Responses to “Heavy Loyalists vs. Light Loyalists”

dru Says:

Paul you amaze me with the shear quantity of content you produce. What did you end up getting your masters in?

dru Says:

Interesting. Even though this is the current article, the page lists it as a previous article…

Paul Scrivens Says:

Thanks dru. As we all know though, quantity is nothing if the quality of the content does not exist.

I receieved my Masters in Management Information Systems, and online collaboration tools were a major part of my studies. I will admit that I definitely do more writing online than I ever did in school however.

Mike Rundle Says:

Dru, thanks for the usability heads-up regarding the “Recent Entries” listing on the right-side of the page.

We’re still working on how to represent current vs. previous articles, expect it to change in the near future :)

Erik Sagen Says:

Very informative. The site looks great and the writing is clear and to the point. I thought I’d get that off my chest before moving on to my comment.

In regards to your mentioning Nokia’s marketing strategy for the NGage, I couldn’t agree more that their “hype” killed the product, which let’s face it, wasn’t all what it was cracked up to be.

I was contacted by Nokia, after filling out their NGage Marketing form, to market the product wherever I could. The sales representative on the phone was enthusiastic (as most sales people are) as he explained the features of the NGage. I was stoked, but after reading about how poorly the product was put together, and after testing it out, I refused to participate.

You’re absolutely correct, however. Overhype, if not done properly, can literally kill the product if it doesn’t live up to it’s supposed expectations.

The same time, money, sweat and tears needs to be invested in the product design, otherwise the ultimate end result is the demise and poor sales of the product.

Mike Rundle Says:

Thinking about the NGage always leads me back to one of my all-time favorite websites, Side Talking :)

Add Your Comment

Comments are moderated because spam's not tolerated.

Splashpress Media

Blog Archives

  • Categories
  • Friends

  • Blogroll


    Performancing Metrics
    Become a blog host

    Performancing Metrics

    ©2004-2008 Business Logs. All rights reserved.